<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ALL DOG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>All The Latest Dog The Bounty Hunter News.  NO False Rumors or Gossip Here.  100% True Facts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Tim Chapman Is Now On Facebook by Janice</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/tim-chapman-is-now-on-facebook/#comment-4446</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1515#comment-4446</guid>
		<description>Dream On JO JO, no way Tim is coming back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dream On JO JO, no way Tim is coming back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapbros by Laura</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/chapbros/#comment-4444</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1738#comment-4444</guid>
		<description>To BJW: So she can be as rude as she wants to Dog&#039;s kids as long as she makes Dog happy?  Some logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To BJW: So she can be as rude as she wants to Dog&#8217;s kids as long as she makes Dog happy?  Some logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tim Chapman Is Now On Facebook by jo jo</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/tim-chapman-is-now-on-facebook/#comment-4443</link>
		<dc:creator>jo jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1515#comment-4443</guid>
		<description>tim hurry back to the sho some folks have nothing better to do then to make up stories as far as a wife goes move on if they do it once they will do it again hey im single !!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tim hurry back to the sho some folks have nothing better to do then to make up stories as far as a wife goes move on if they do it once they will do it again hey im single !!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapbros by Janice</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/chapbros/#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1738#comment-4442</guid>
		<description>The truth sucks right. Any behaviour is permissible in your logic.  Sorry, not in ours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth sucks right. Any behaviour is permissible in your logic.  Sorry, not in ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapbros by BJW</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/chapbros/#comment-4441</link>
		<dc:creator>BJW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1738#comment-4441</guid>
		<description>Shame on you-if she makes Dog happy-then she is ok in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame on you-if she makes Dog happy-then she is ok in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beth Chapman Does Not Live By What She Preaches. Why Does She Not Support Her Own Family ? by ON THE SPOT</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/beth-chapman-does-not-live-by-what-she-preaches/#comment-4440</link>
		<dc:creator>ON THE SPOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1697#comment-4440</guid>
		<description>YOU KNOW I GOT SOMETHING TO SAY: I&#039;M GOING TO SAY THIS IT MIGHT BE WRONG BUT ITS TRUE WHY IN THE WORLD IS DOG LETTING THIS HAPPEN. HE IS LOSING FANS LEFT AND RIGHT. REALLY WITHOUT HER HE IS A GOOD GUY BUT SHE BRINGS HIM DOWN AND HE WON&#039;T SEE IT NOT EVEN KNOW THAT HIS  BOYS R BEING TREATED BAD BY HER. I DONT UNDERSTAND. WE WOULD BE THERE FOR HIM BUT CAN&#039;T TAKE HER NOMORE. HOPE TO GET RESPONSES ON THIS: SHE&#039;LL LOOK WHAT WE WROTE BUT HE NEVER WILL SHE HAS A WAY OF MAKING SURE HE DONT KNOW WHAT HIS FANS ARE SAYING. REALLY SHE DOES THIS. IT&#039;S SAD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU KNOW I GOT SOMETHING TO SAY: I&#8217;M GOING TO SAY THIS IT MIGHT BE WRONG BUT ITS TRUE WHY IN THE WORLD IS DOG LETTING THIS HAPPEN. HE IS LOSING FANS LEFT AND RIGHT. REALLY WITHOUT HER HE IS A GOOD GUY BUT SHE BRINGS HIM DOWN AND HE WON&#8217;T SEE IT NOT EVEN KNOW THAT HIS  BOYS R BEING TREATED BAD BY HER. I DONT UNDERSTAND. WE WOULD BE THERE FOR HIM BUT CAN&#8217;T TAKE HER NOMORE. HOPE TO GET RESPONSES ON THIS: SHE&#8217;LL LOOK WHAT WE WROTE BUT HE NEVER WILL SHE HAS A WAY OF MAKING SURE HE DONT KNOW WHAT HIS FANS ARE SAYING. REALLY SHE DOES THIS. IT&#8217;S SAD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapbros by Laura</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/chapbros/#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1738#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>Imelda Marcos.  Perfect analogy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imelda Marcos.  Perfect analogy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beth Chapman Does Not Live By What She Preaches. Why Does She Not Support Her Own Family ? by Janice</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/beth-chapman-does-not-live-by-what-she-preaches/#comment-4431</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1697#comment-4431</guid>
		<description>Yes she could have. It is clear she does not by her selfish Tweet and refusal to mention the boys</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes she could have. It is clear she does not by her selfish Tweet and refusal to mention the boys</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From FOX News by dress hunter</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/12/24/from-fox-news/#comment-4430</link>
		<dc:creator>dress hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1734#comment-4430</guid>
		<description>wonder where lyssa got that dress from - its off the hook! i want it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonder where lyssa got that dress from &#8211; its off the hook! i want it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beth Chapman Does Not Live By What She Preaches. Why Does She Not Support Her Own Family ? by Angie</title>
		<link>http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/beth-chapman-does-not-live-by-what-she-preaches/#comment-4428</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogsupporter.wordpress.com/?p=1697#comment-4428</guid>
		<description>Maybe she could have said &quot;We are not directly involved with Chapbros, but support &quot;our&quot; sons 100% in this venture.  Would that have been too hard?  Certainly have been more appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe she could have said &#8220;We are not directly involved with Chapbros, but support &#8220;our&#8221; sons 100% in this venture.  Would that have been too hard?  Certainly have been more appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
